Skip to Content
Last modified by Douglas Bower on 2026/02/04 03:20
Show last authors
1 45 Minutes Support Time
2
3 Amazones.com - Is a email spam tracking system a amazon that protects our email server from being blacklisted?
4
5 This has noting to do with Adenium's Black Listing.
6
7 This is most likely due to something in the notification content.
8
9 Who is the customer using for email smtp server? Spam prevention?
10 Have they sent us the content so that we can determine if the content they are sending is triggering the spam?
11
12 Are they using SpamCanibal?
13
14 What can cause this type of rejection?
15
16 Recipients who have previously marked content from this company as Spam.
17 Content within the email triggers the recipients spam filters.
18
19 Here is an internet discussion on the exact same message that we are getting: [[http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r27768051-Bounced-back-email-qdetected-as-spamq]]
20
21 Of the 6 emails that they sent that bounced back, there only 4 domains, and only two SMTP Servers.
22
23 [[pgauci@firestopinternational.com>>mailto:pgauci@firestopinternational.com]]uses Network Solutions as their email SMTP Server: netsolmail.net
24 [[mnaquin@firestopinternational.com>>mailto:mnaquin@firestopinternational.com]]uses Network Solutions as their email SMTP Server: netsolmail.netuses Network Solutions as their email SMTP Server: netsolmail.net
25
26 [[ksinclair@thepayneco.com>>mailto:ksinclair@thepayneco.com]]uses Network Solutions as their email SMTP Server: netsolmail.net
27
28 [[estimating@wercospecs.com>>mailto:estimating@wercospecs.com]]uses register.com as their email SMTP Server:registeredsite.com
29 [[eric@wercospecs.com>>mailto:eric@wercospecs.com]]uses register.com as their email SMTP Server:registeredsite.comuses register.com as their email SMTP Server:registeredsite.com
30
31 [[wayne@camuselectric.com>>mailto:wayne@camuselectric.com]]usesNetwork Solutions as their email SMTP Server: netsolmail.net
32
33 [[http://www.exclamationsoft.com/exclamationsoft/netmailbot/help/website/HowToFindTheSMTPMailServerForAnEmailAddress.html]]
34
35 [[http://forums.networksolutions.com/nsmail-f47-customer-email-being-blocked-t8401.html]]
36
37 Lechase came in Fine...
38
39 White List Instructions:
40 [[http://www.emaildeliveryjedi.com/mywhitelist.php]]- We can use this site to create instructions that can be sent to users who are having problems.
41 [[http://www.sysop.com/whitelist.php]]
42
43 [[http://agorafinancial.com/help/whitelist-us/]]
44 [[http://www.spamhaus.org/whitelist/]]
45 [[http://barronmarketingsolutions.com/whitelist-us/]]
46
47 Tools to test spam metrics of an email:
48 [[http://spamcheck.postmarkapp.com/]]
49 [[http://isnotspam.com/]]
50
51 [[image:b242af03963e23bc0d1bd32ee2e29b71.png]]
52
53 ||Latest Report Details
54
55 ----
56
57 [[Delete this report>>http://isnotspam.com/newlatestreport.php?email=ins-if34hvkz%40isnotspam.com#]]
58 This message is an automatic response from isNOTspams authentication verifier service. The service allows email senders to perform a simple check of various sender authentication mechanisms. It is provided free of charge, in the hope that it is useful to the email community. While it is not officially supported, we welcome any feedback you may have at..
59
60 Thank you for using isNOTspam.
61
62 The isNOTspam team
63
64 ==========================================================
65
66 Summary of Results
67
68 ==========================================================
69
70 SPF Check : pass
71
72 Sender-ID Check : pass
73
74 DomainKeys Check : neutral
75
76 DKIM Check : pass
77
78 SpamAssassin Check : ham (non-spam)
79
80 ==========================================================
81
82 Details:
83
84 ==========================================================
85
86 HELO hostname: a8-60.smtp-out.amazonses.com
87
88 Source IP: 54.240.8.60
89
90 mail-from: blacklinecorp@cloudprojectnotifications.com
91
92 Anonymous To: ins-if34hvkz@isnotspam.com
93
94 ---------------------------------------------------------
95
96 SPF check details:
97
98 ----------------------------------------------------------
99
100 Result: pass
101
102 ID(s) verified: smtp.mail=blacklinecorp@cloudprojectnotifications.com
103
104 DNS record(s):
105
106 ----------------------------------------------------------
107
108 Sender-ID check details:
109
110 ----------------------------------------------------------
111
112 Result: pass
113
114 ID(s) verified: smtp.mail=blacklinecorp@cloudprojectnotifications.com
115
116 DNS record(s):
117
118 ----------------------------------------------------------
119
120 DomainKeys check details:
121
122 ----------------------------------------------------------
123
124 Result: neutral (message not signed)
125
126 ID(s) verified: header.From=blacklinecorp@cloudprojectnotifications.com
127
128 Selector=
129
130 domain=
131
132 DomainKeys DNS Record=
133
134 ----------------------------------------------------------
135
136 DKIM check details:
137
138 ----------------------------------------------------------
139
140 Result: pass
141
142 ID(s) verified: header.From=blacklinecorp@cloudprojectnotifications.com
143
144 Selector=224i4yxa5dv7c2xz3womw6peuasteono
145
146 domain=amazonses.com
147
148 DomainKeys DNS Record=224i4yxa5dv7c2xz3womw6peuasteono._domainkey.amazonses.com
149
150 ----------------------------------------------------------
151
152 SpamAssassin check details:
153
154 ----------------------------------------------------------
155
156 SpamAssassin v3.3.1 (2010-03-19)
157
158 Result: ham (non-spam) (03.1points, 10.0 required)
159
160 pts rule name description
161
162 ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------
163
164 * -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low
165
166 * trust
167
168 * [54.240.8.60 listed in list.dnswl.org]
169
170 * 3.5 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 99 to 100%
171
172 * [score: 1.0000]
173
174 * -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
175
176 * -0.0 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain
177
178 * 0.2 BAYES_999 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 99.9 to 100%
179
180 * [score: 1.0000]
181
182 * 0.1 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
183
184 * 0.3 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts
185
186 * 0.0 MIME_QP_LONG_LINE RAW: Quoted-printable line longer than 76 chars
187
188 * 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily
189
190 * valid
191
192 * -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
193
194 X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=3.1 required=-20.0 tests=BAYES_99,BAYES_999,
195
196 DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_HTML_ONLY,MIME_QP_LONG_LINE,
197
198 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.1
199
200 X-Spam-Score: 3.1
201
202 To learn more about the terms used in the SpamAssassin report, please search
203
204 here:[[http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/]]
205
206 ==========================================================
207
208 Explanation of the possible results (adapted from
209
210 draft-kucherawy-sender-auth-header-04.txt):
211
212 ==========================================================
213
214 pass
215
216 the message passed the authentication test.
217
218 fail
219
220 the message failed the authentication test.
221
222 softfail
223
224 the message failed the authentication test, and the authentication
225
226 method has either an explicit or implicit policy which doesnt require
227
228 successful authentication of all messages from that domain.
229
230 neutral
231
232 the authentication method completed without errors, but was unable
233
234 to reach either a positive or a negative result about the message.
235
236 temperror
237
238 a temporary (recoverable) error occurred attempting to authenticate
239
240 the sender; either the process couldnt be completed locally, or
241
242 there was a temporary failure retrieving data required for the
243
244 authentication. A later retry may produce a more final result.
245
246 permerror
247
248 a permanent (unrecoverable) error occurred attempting to
249
250 authenticate the sender; either the process couldnt be completed
251
252 locally, or there was a permanent failure retrieving data required
253
254 for the authentication.
255
256 ----
257 **Originally created:** 2014-09-22 16:14
258 **Source:** [[http://isnotspam.com/newlatestreport.php?email=ins-if34hvkz%40isnotspam.com]]