Blackline Construction Email / SPAM Problem
45 Minutes Support Time
Amazones.com - Is a email spam tracking system a amazon that protects our email server from being blacklisted?
This has noting to do with Adenium's Black Listing.
This is most likely due to something in the notification content.
Who is the customer using for email smtp server? Spam prevention?
Have they sent us the content so that we can determine if the content they are sending is triggering the spam?
Are they using SpamCanibal?
What can cause this type of rejection?
Recipients who have previously marked content from this company as Spam.
Content within the email triggers the recipients spam filters.
Here is an internet discussion on the exact same message that we are getting: http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r27768051-Bounced-back-email-qdetected-as-spamq
Of the 6 emails that they sent that bounced back, there only 4 domains, and only two SMTP Servers.
pgauci@firestopinternational.comuses Network Solutions as their email SMTP Server: netsolmail.net
mnaquin@firestopinternational.comuses Network Solutions as their email SMTP Server: netsolmail.netuses Network Solutions as their email SMTP Server: netsolmail.net
ksinclair@thepayneco.comuses Network Solutions as their email SMTP Server: netsolmail.net
estimating@wercospecs.comuses register.com as their email SMTP Server:registeredsite.com
eric@wercospecs.comuses register.com as their email SMTP Server:registeredsite.comuses register.com as their email SMTP Server:registeredsite.com
wayne@camuselectric.comusesNetwork Solutions as their email SMTP Server: netsolmail.net
http://forums.networksolutions.com/nsmail-f47-customer-email-being-blocked-t8401.html
Lechase came in Fine...
White List Instructions:
http://www.emaildeliveryjedi.com/mywhitelist.php- We can use this site to create instructions that can be sent to users who are having problems.
http://www.sysop.com/whitelist.php
http://agorafinancial.com/help/whitelist-us/
http://www.spamhaus.org/whitelist/
http://barronmarketingsolutions.com/whitelist-us/
Tools to test spam metrics of an email:
http://spamcheck.postmarkapp.com/
http://isnotspam.com/
| Latest Report Details |
Delete this report
This message is an automatic response from isNOTspams authentication verifier service. The service allows email senders to perform a simple check of various sender authentication mechanisms. It is provided free of charge, in the hope that it is useful to the email community. While it is not officially supported, we welcome any feedback you may have at..
Thank you for using isNOTspam.
The isNOTspam team
Summary of Results
SPF Check : pass
Sender-ID Check : pass
DomainKeys Check : neutral
DKIM Check : pass
SpamAssassin Check : ham (non-spam)
Details:
HELO hostname: a8-60.smtp-out.amazonses.com
Source IP: 54.240.8.60
mail-from: blacklinecorp@cloudprojectnotifications.com
Anonymous To: ins-if34hvkz@isnotspam.com
SPF check details:
Result: pass
ID(s) verified: smtp.mail=blacklinecorp@cloudprojectnotifications.com
DNS record(s):
Sender-ID check details:
Result: pass
ID(s) verified: smtp.mail=blacklinecorp@cloudprojectnotifications.com
DNS record(s):
DomainKeys check details:
Result: neutral (message not signed)
ID(s) verified: header.From=blacklinecorp@cloudprojectnotifications.com
Selector=
domain=
DomainKeys DNS Record=
DKIM check details:
Result: pass
ID(s) verified: header.From=blacklinecorp@cloudprojectnotifications.com
Selector=224i4yxa5dv7c2xz3womw6peuasteono
domain=amazonses.com
DomainKeys DNS Record=224i4yxa5dv7c2xz3womw6peuasteono._domainkey.amazonses.com
SpamAssassin check details:
SpamAssassin v3.3.1 (2010-03-19)
Result: ham (non-spam) (03.1points, 10.0 required)
pts rule name description
-
- -1.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low
- trust
- [54.240.8.60 listed in list.dnswl.org]
- 3.5 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 99 to 100%
- [score: 1.0000]
- -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
- -0.0 RP_MATCHES_RCVD Envelope sender domain matches handover relay domain
- 0.2 BAYES_999 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 99.9 to 100%
- [score: 1.0000]
- 0.1 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
- 0.3 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts
- 0.0 MIME_QP_LONG_LINE RAW: Quoted-printable line longer than 76 chars
- 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily
- valid
- -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=3.1 required=-20.0 tests=BAYES_99,BAYES_999,
DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HTML_MESSAGE,MIME_HTML_ONLY,MIME_QP_LONG_LINE,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=no version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Score: 3.1
To learn more about the terms used in the SpamAssassin report, please search
here:http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/
Explanation of the possible results (adapted from
draft-kucherawy-sender-auth-header-04.txt):
pass
the message passed the authentication test.
fail
the message failed the authentication test.
softfail
the message failed the authentication test, and the authentication
method has either an explicit or implicit policy which doesnt require
successful authentication of all messages from that domain.
neutral
the authentication method completed without errors, but was unable
to reach either a positive or a negative result about the message.
temperror
a temporary (recoverable) error occurred attempting to authenticate
the sender; either the process couldnt be completed locally, or
there was a temporary failure retrieving data required for the
authentication. A later retry may produce a more final result.
permerror
a permanent (unrecoverable) error occurred attempting to
authenticate the sender; either the process couldnt be completed
locally, or there was a permanent failure retrieving data required
for the authentication.
Originally created: 2014-09-22 16:14
Source: http://isnotspam.com/newlatestreport.php?email=ins-if34hvkz%40isnotspam.com